Dipo Olowookere
By Dipo Olowookere
The management of Access Bank Plc has rubbished reports in some sections of the media that the bank and its official were recently charged to court by the Independent Corruption Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC).
The lender and its officials were reported to have been dragged to court over their alleged refusal to lift a Post-No-Debit (PND) order on the accounts belonging to Blaid Properties Limited and Blaid Construction Limited.
Reacting to the issue via a statement, Access Bank said the report, which it claimed contained misleading information, was mainly “calculated to embarrass the bank, its executives and stakeholders.”
The financial institution said it was not aware of “any criminal charge filed against it or any of its officers” neither has any of its officers been served with any criminal summons.
“The publications were calculated to harass and intimidate the bank and its officers for no just cause,” the statement noted.
It said, “As a responsible financial institution which conducts its business transparently within the confines of the law, we consider it imperative to state the following facts relating to the matter.
“Contrary to the publication, neither the bank nor any of its officers mentioned in the publication were arraigned by the ICPC as reported.”
Access Bank explained that, “The ICPC had on the January 18, 2017 instructed the bank not to allow any withdrawal from the Accounts which it was investigating at the time. The bank complied with the instruction by restricting the accounts.
“By another letter dated November 6, 2017, the ICPC instructed the bank to lift the PND on the accounts. In compliance with this second directive, the bank took steps to engage the customers to re-activate the accounts which had since gone dormant due to the restrictions earlier placed on them.
“However, by another letter dated November 9, 2017, the Special Presidential Investigation Panel on Recovery of Public Property directed the bank to place PND on the accounts. The Presidential Panel by its letter of November 14, 2017 subsequently, reiterated its earlier directive amongst others and invited officers of the bank to an interview with its instruction on the accounts.
“Again, by a letter dated November 28, 2017, the ICPC ordered the bank to lift the PND on the accounts stating that the order supersedes any order or orders placing PND on the accounts.
“The bank by its letter dated November 29, 2017 notified the ICPC that the PND was at the instance and request of the Presidential Panel and that there was a pending suit and application filed by the Federal Government of Nigeria, Attorney General of Federation and the Presidential Panel seeking to restrain the bank from releasing any funds from the accounts.
“The bank also notified the ICPC of court to transfer the funds in the accounts to the Registrar of the Federal High Court pending the determination of the suit filed by the Federal Government of Nigeria.
“The bank subsequently received an invitation from the ICPC addressed to its branches and not the Group Managing Director or any of the officers mentioned in the media publications. The bank honoured the invitation and there again reiterated the foregoing facts.
“Notwithstanding the clear facts presented by the bank, the ICPC demanded that the bank provide evidence that the PND had been lifted by Thursday December 7, 2017 failing which its officers would be detained.
“Being a responsible organisation, officers of the bank returned to the ICPC with an advice from the bank’s Solicitors again stating why the bank cannot lift the PND in disregard of the directive of Presidential Panel and the case in court in which the Federal Government and the Attorney General of the Federation in suit No FHC/ABJ/CS1114/2017 were seeking to restrain the bank from releasing funds in the accounts.
“Given what had transpired we were therefore rudely shocked to read the newspaper publications given fact that the bank and its officers have not done anything to warrant being charged for any offence.”
Access Bank said it was “at a loss as to how a government agency setup to fight graft would attempt to criminalize the bank and its officers for complying with the directive of the Presidential Panel to place PND on the accounts which are subject of pending suits.”
“We have stated the above facts to clear any misgivings or mischief calculated to embarrass or intimidate the bank. As a responsible corporate citizen, we remain committed to the ideals of good corporate governance, due process and rule of law,” the lender assured.
